Cases 1 - 10 of 38
REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY NATHAN HERRMANN
as 1:2024mc00103
Unknown:
REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY NATHAN HERRMANN
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
FARRON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
JULIANA FARRON, SHAHAR BAUSI, NOA BAUSI and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
AKTER v. FLOOK
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
FATEMA AKTER
Defendant:
NATHAN FLOOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
MST SORAYA AKTHER and NO PARTY
Not Classified By Court:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, RICHARD C. VISEK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
COX v. DEWEES et al
as 1:2022mc00113
Petitioner:
VALENCIA-MARIE COX
Respondent:
ROBERT DEWEES III, GREG DALY, JAY SMITH and others
BOWNESS GEIGER et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2022cv02986
Plaintiff:
TARA LYNN BOWNESS GEIGER and NATHAN MARC GEIGER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. CONSULATE IN MONTREAL, CANADA, ANTONY BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. XLEAR, INC. et al
as 1:2022mc00053
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
XLEAR, INC. and NATHAN JONES
GREENE et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022cv01452
Plaintiff:
SHAUN GREENE, LINN BAKER, JOHN E BRAUN and others
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
