Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Airbnb, Inc. et al v. Visa Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05251
Plaintiff:
Airbnb Payments, Inc., Airbnb, Inc. and Hotel Tonight LLC
Defendant:
Visa Inc., Visa International Service Association and Visa U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Crawford v. United Payment Center Inc.
as 7:2024cv04952
Plaintiff:
Tanya S. Crawford
Defendant:
United Payment Center Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Palmco Administration, LLC v. Flower Payment, Inc.
as 1:2023cv07409
Petitioner:
Palmco Administration, LLC
Respondent:
Flower Payment, Inc. (f/k/a Flower Power, Inc. and Flower Power Co. Ltd. Japan a/k/a Flower Denryoky Kabushiki Kaisha, Flower Payment, Inc. and Flower Power, Inc. and Flower Power Co. Ltd. Japan a
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 207 Application for order confirming award of arbitrators
Scott v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08600
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., James G. Kelly, Mark A. Chancy and others
Moore v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08518
Plaintiff:
Jon Moore
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., Rafik R. Sidhom, James G. Kelly and others
Waterman v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08090
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., Mark A. Chancy, Vahe A. Dombalagian and others
Wolfson v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08104
Plaintiff:
Barbara Wolfson
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., James G. Kelly, Rafik R. Sidhom and others
Whitfield v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08085
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., Mark A. Chancy, Vahe A. Dombalagian and others
Leyva Jr. v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07805
Plaintiff:
Luis Leyva Jr.
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., Rafik R. Sidhom, James G. Kelly and others
O'Dell v. EVO Payments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07751
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
EVO Payments, Inc., James G. Kelly, Rafik R. Sidhom and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
