Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Kaufman v. Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04454
Plaintiff:
David Kaufman
Defendant:
Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc., Cheryl Henry, Robin P. Selati and others
Wheeler v. Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04354
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wheeler
Defendant:
Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc., Cheryl J. Henry, Giannella Alvarez and others
O'Dell v. Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04253
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc., Cheryl Henry, Robin P. Selati and others
Wilhelm v. Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00562
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc., Cheryl Henry, Robin P. Selati and others
Thompson v. Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04254
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Defendant:
Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc., Cheryl Henry, Robin P. Selati and others
Wolfe v. Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04172
Plaintiff:
Russell Wolfe
Defendant:
Ruth's Hospitality Group, Inc., Cheryl Henry, Robin P. Selati and others
EIPCa, et al v. Shirley Weber, et al
as 21-56061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELECTION INTEGRITY PROJECT CALIFORNIA, INC., JAMES P. BRADLEY, AJA SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY WEBER, California Secretary of State, ROB BONTA, California Attorney General, GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California and others
McPheters v. CounterPath Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01189
Defendant:
Owen Matthews, Terence Matthews, Chris R Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
James McPheters
Gallo v. CounterPath Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01031
Defendant:
Owen Matthews, Terence Matthews, Chris R Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Gallo
Michael Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School, et al
as 20-16674
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTINE L. WILBURN, SEAN JAMES BIAS, STEPHANIE R.C. KANG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GEARY WILSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
