Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Justin Mahwikizi v. Thomas M. Durkin
as 23-3369
Petitioner:
JUSTIN MAHWIKIZI
Respondent:
THOMAS M. DURKIN
Interested Party:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER, LLC
Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. v. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
as 23-3445
Petitioner:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and RASIER-CA, LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court:
JANE DOE LS 340, an individual, KATHERINE HYLIN, an individual, E. R., an individual and others
E. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as CAN/3:23-CV-04744
Plaintiff:
E. and E. E.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cormier v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as CAN/3:23-CV-04745
Plaintiff:
Cormier and Joshua Cormier
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Worzalla v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as CAN/3:23-CV-04731
Plaintiff:
Worzalla and Heather Worzalla
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
C. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as CAN/3:23-CV-04723
Plaintiff:
C. and J. C.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
R. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as CAN/3:23-CV-04706
Plaintiff:
R. and B. R.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Halstenberg v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as CAN/3:23-CV-04705
Plaintiff:
Halstenberg and Melanie Halstenberg
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
O. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as CAN/3:23-CV-04643
Plaintiff:
O. and K. O.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
D. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as CAN/3:23-CV-04617
Plaintiff:
D. and H. D.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
