Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00818
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv01031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. THE INN AT DAUPHIN ISLAND LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
INN AT DAUPHIN ISLAND LLC and F RUTHERFORD SMITH, JR
Garnishee:
DEEPWATER HORIZON CLAIMS CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Enforcement of Judgment
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. THE INN AT DAUPHIN ISLAND LLC et al
as 3:2012mc00090
Plaintiff:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
THE INN AT DAUPHIN ISLAND LLC and F RUTHERFORD SMITH, JR
Rutherford v. Zoom Tan, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00509
Plaintiff:
Shaina A. Rutherford
Defendant:
Zoom Tan, Inc. , Zoom Tan, LLC , Zoom Tan Franchising, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Royal Palm Properties, LLC v. Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate LLC et al
as 9:2011cv81294
Plaintiff:
Royal Palm Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate LLC , Todd Warren Schleicher , Ann Elyse Rutherford and others
Counter_defendant:
David Wesley Roberts and Royal Palm Properties, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Ann Elyse Rutherford , Todd Warren Schleicher , Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Perreault v. Mulhall, P.A.
as 3:2010mc00007
Respondent:
Jacques D. Perreault
Movant:
Rutherford Mulhall, P.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
