Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CATO INSTITUTE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
CATO INSTITUTE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
DENSON v. AUSTIN
as 1:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
SANDRA DENSON
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and LLOYD AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
TURSE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2022cv02970
Plaintiff:
NICK TURSE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE / JOINT STAFF and U.S. SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
LUOKUNG TECHNOLOGY CORP. et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2021cv00583
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND WEIMAN BAI, LUOKUNG TECHNOLOGY CORP. and BAOMIN LI
Not Classified By Court:
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and SECRETARY OF TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP v. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AND THE JOINT STAFF
as 1:2020cv01587
Plaintiff:
WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AND THE JOINT STAFF
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ARNESS v. MATTIS et al.
as 1:2018cv01796
Plaintiff:
Mark K. Arness
Undetermined:
SECAF SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF AIR FORCE and SECDOD SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Defendant:
HEATHER WILSON and JAMES MATTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
ATHERTON v. JEWELL et al
as 1:2014cv02160
Plaintiff:
PETER JAMES ATHERTON
Defendant:
SALLY JEWELL, ROBERT MACLEAN, VERANELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LETOURNEAU v. CALANDRA et al
as 1:2012cv01644
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH LETOURNEAU
Defendant:
ANTHONY CALANDRA , NAVY GATEWAY INN AND SUITES , SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
