Cases 1 - 7 of 7
AMAZON.COM, INC. et al v. WDC HOLDINGS LLC et al
as 1:2021mc00153
Receiver:
MARK A. ROBERTS
Plaintiff:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON DATA SERVICES, INC.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
800 HOYTLLC
Defendant:
WDC HOLDINGS LLC doing business as NORTHSTAR COMMERCIAL PARTNERS, BRIAN WATSON, STERLING NCP FF, LLC and others
Interpleader:
WDC HOLDINGS, LLC, PLW CAPITAL I, LLC and BW HOLDINGS, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
STERLING MERCHANT FINANCE LTD v. REPUBLIC OF CABO VERDE
as 1:2016cv01285
Petitioner:
STERLING MERCHANT FINANCE LTD
Respondent:
REPUBLIC OF CABO VERDE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
PALMIERI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01403
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW RICHARD PALMIERI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NAVAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES, MAYA PILATOWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
BANKS v. FINLEY FINE JEWELERS COMPANY-SELIGMAN AND LATZ INCORPORATED AND GIMBLES et al
as 1:2011cv01880
Plaintiff:
IRA R. BANKS
Defendant:
FINLEY FINE JEWELERS COMPANY-SELIGMAN AND LATZ INCORPORATED AND GIMBLES, STERLING MERCHANDISE, ARTHUR ANDERSON JEWELERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. FINLEY FINE JEWLERS COMPANY-SELIGMAN AND LATZ INCORPORATED AND GIMBLES et al
as 1:2011cv01365
Plaintiff:
IRA R. BANKS
Defendant:
FINLEY FINE JEWLERS COMPANY-SELIGMAN AND LATZ INCORPORATED AND GIMBLES, STERLING MERCHANDISE, ARTHUR ANDERSON JEWELERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STERLING STEEL CO., LLC v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY et al
as 1:2008cv00539
Plaintiff:
STERLING STEEL CO., LLC, STERLING STEEL CO., LLC and STERLING STEEL CO., LLC
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
