Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Preston Bennett v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 22-8016
Petitioner:
PRESTON BENNETT
Respondent:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County and COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Thomas J. Dart, et al v. Willie Clay
as 21-8029
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County and COUNTY OF COOK
Respondent:
WILLIE CLAY
Larry Tate v. Thomas J. Dart, et al
as 21-2752
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY TATE
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County, MATTHEW BURKE, REBECCA REIERSON and others
Deisy Jaimes, et al v. Cook County, Illinois, et al
as 21-1958
Defendant / Appellee:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, JUANITA PETERSON, Lieutenant #635, GEORGE TURNER, First Assistant Executive Director of CCDOD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ENRIQUE JAIMES, DEISY JAIMES and GLORIA JAIMES
Tyrone Kirkman v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 20-2282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRONE D. KIRKMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE and THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois
Courtney McFields v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 20-1391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COURTNEY MCFIELDS
Defendant / Appellee:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County
Courtney McFields, et al v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 19-8019
Respondent:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County
Petitioner:
PIERRE BRUNT, WALTER WILLIAMS, COURTNEY MCFIELDS and others
Willie Bell v. Thomas Dart
as 19-2451
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE C. BELL
Thomas Dart v. Brian Otero
as 14-8024
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County
Respondent:
BRIAN OTERO, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals
John Smentek, et al v. Geraldine Brown
as 14-1690
Petitioner:
JOHN SMENTEK, MALCOLM PATTON, MELVIN PHILLIPS and others
Respondent:
GERALDINE SOAT BROWN
Party-in-Interest:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
