Cases 1 - 6 of 6
ALCRESTA THERAPEUTICS, INC. et al v. BECERRA et al
as 1:2022cv01149
Plaintiff:
ALCRESTA THERAPEUTICS, INC., JAMES HENRY and STEPHANIE A. WEBSTER
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA and CHIQUITA BROOKS-LASURE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
WEBSTER v. BANK-FUND STAFF FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 1:2020cv03317
Defendant:
BANK-FUND STAFF FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WEBSTER v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE et al
as 1:2015cv00127
Petitioner:
DAVID DONALD WEBSTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
IN RE: STEPHEN THOMAS YELVERTON
as 1:2014mc00817
Appellant:
STEPHEN THOMAS YELVERTON
Appellee:
WENDELL W. WEBSTER , MRSC INSURANCE PARTNERS and JEFFREY L. TARKENTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, et al v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al
as 1:2011cv01629
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS , COALITION FOR A DEMOCRATIC WORKPLACE , NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD , MARK PEARCE , CRAIG BECKER and others
Amicu:
JOHN KLINE , UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES , DAN BURTON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
BLACKMAN, et al v. DC, et al
as 1:1997cv01629
Plaintiff:
MARY ANN BLACKMAN , PAUL CHASSY , CAROLYN JONES and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS and JEFF MYERS
Movant:
KEINETH EWELL, SHONTAY ALEXANDER, JAY BROWN and others
Pecial_master:
Elise T. Baach and AMY TOTENBERG
Claimant:
DANIEL THOMAS , VICTORIA HARRIS and MARION BAURLEY
Intervenor_defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS and OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
