Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada et al v. Lloyds Refrigeration et al
as 2:2013mc00046
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 88 Section 401 k Plan and others
Defendant:
Lloyds Refrigeration, Walter Price Lloyd, Yolanda Bautista Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
SEC v. Merrill Scott Ltd, et al
as 2:2002cv00039
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Merrill Scott & Associates LTD, Merrill Scott & Associates , Phoenix Overseas Advisers and others
Receiver:
David K. Broadbent
Movant:
The Scott K. Canepa Charitable Supporting Organization and Scott K. Canepa
Thirdparty_defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, England and James P. Landis
Consol_plaintiff:
Curt Woods , Kathy Woods , Curt & Kathy Woods Charitable Supporting Foundation and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Charles Cozean
Intervenor_defendant:
Merrill Scott & Associates LTD, Merrill Scott & Associates , Phoenix Overseas Advisers and others
Consol_defendant:
David K. Broadbent, T Shelton Powers , Advantage Software, Inc. and others
Claimant:
Val Eylands and Jana Eylands
Consol_counter_claimant:
Jeremy Thorne
Counter_claimant:
Jeremy Thorne and Singularity Software
Counter_defendant:
David K. Broadbent
Intervenor:
USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Jackson v. Lloyd
as 2:2009cv00446
Plaintiff:
James F. Jackson
Defendant:
Talbot H. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
