Cases 1 - 10 of 17
USA v. William Wilson
as 22-2107
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM HUGH WILSON
Clarence Otworth v. Fifth Third Bank, et al
as 20-1286
Defendant / Appellee:
PHILLIP C. BODLE, An individual, WILLIAM DUNCAN SCHUETTE, Former Michigan Attorney General, WILLIAMS & HUGHES, Law firm in Muskegon, MI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE MATTHEW OTWORTH
Clarence Otworth v. Fifth Third Bank, et al
as 20-1156
Defendant / Appellee:
PHILLIP C. BODLE, An individual, WILLIAM DUNCAN SCHUETTE, Former Michigan Attorney General, WILLIAMS & HUGHES, Law firm in Muskegon, MI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE MATTHEW OTWORTH
William Wilson v. USA
as 20-1161
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM HUGH WILSON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Daniel Rudd v. City of Norton Shores, et al
as 19-1226
Defendant / Appellee:
MELISSA MEYERS, Attorney, individually and acting on behalf of her law firm, CITY OF NORTON SHORES, MATTHEW RHYNDRESS, Sergeant, individually and in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL WILLIAM RUDD
USA v. William Cravens
as 18-30185
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM HUGHES CRAVENS
USA v. William Weygandt
as 14-10356
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM HUGH WEYGANDT
Hughes et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as MD/1:13-cv-02533
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Linda Hughes and William Hughes
Aleem et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as CAN/3:13-cv-03051
Plaintiff:
Tauheedah Aleem , Evelyn Arnette-Payan , Clarice Bazile and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
William Collington v. Department of Human Services, et al
as 12-7080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Hugh Collington
Defendant - Appellee:
Department of Human Services and Sharon Biggs, Department of Human Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
