Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Zhang et al v. Han et al
as 1:2021cv01625
Defendant:
Junjun Feng, Hanfor (Cayman) Limited, BZ Industrial (China) and others
Plaintiff:
Wei Fan, Jun Zhou, Minglian Zhang and others
Jones et al v. New York City Department of Education et al
as 1:2016cv01149
Defendant:
John and Jane 1 through 10 Doe, Bernard Gassaway, New York City Department of Education and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cherry Hill Gourmet, Inc. v. Lundy's Management Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv06282
Defendant:
"XYZ Corp. #1" Through "XYZ Corp. #10", Lundy's Management Corp. and Steve Pappas
Plaintiff:
Cherry Hill Gourmet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03294
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv07164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schacher v. Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 7:2013cv00812
Plaintiff:
Lawrence R. Schacher
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, Prudential Financial, Inc., The Prudential Welfare Benefits Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
