Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Lipper v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.
as 1:2013cv00111
Plaintiff:
Pamela Lipper
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., First Magnus Financial Corp., Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
Glavas v. Wallick and Volk, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00566
Plaintiff:
George N Glavas
Defendant:
Wallick and Volk, Inc. , Bank of America, N.A., The Bank of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Khan et al v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2012cv00475
Plaintiff:
Asrar Ahmed Khan and David Landon Murphy
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon, Bank of America, N.A., Recontrust Company, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meade v. Bank of America N.A. et al
as 1:2011cv00973
Plaintiff:
John P Meade
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A. , Bank of America Corporation , Wells Fargo Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bank of America Inc v. Rountree
as 2:2010cv00087
Defendant:
Robert Rountree, Lorena T Ruiz Rountree and Bank of America NA
Plaintiff:
Bank of America NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bank of America v. Apache Corporation et al
as 6:2008cv01138
Plaintiff:
Bank of America and Bank of America
Defendant:
Apache Corporation, BP America Production Company, Chesapeake Operating, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bank of America,NA v. Esparza, et al
as 6:2003cv00346
Plaintiff:
Bank of America,NA
Defendant:
Sharla Esparza , Los Alamos National Bank , Amwest Surety Insurance Company and others
Cross_claimant:
Los Alamos National Bank , Internal Revenue Service and Amwest Surety Insurance Company
Cross_defendant:
Scott Esparza , Sharla Esparza , Los Alamos National Bank and others
Counter_claimant:
Amwest Surety Insurance Company and Los Alamos National Bank
Counter_defendant:
Bank of America,NA
Miscellaneou:
INXS V, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
