Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Resort Center Associates v. Wheeler et al
as 2:2021cv00078
Defendant:
Summit County, Andrew Wheeler, Utah Department of Environmental Quality and others
Plaintiff:
Resort Center Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601
Jenkins v. Salt Lake City Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Lynn Allan Jenkins
Defendant:
Salt Lake City Corporation, Salt Lake County, Layton City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Pillsbury v. City of Enoch, The
as 2:2013cv00948
Plaintiff:
Patrick Pillsbury
Defendant:
City of Enoch, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. City Front Partners et al
as 2:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Rulon Johnson
Defendant:
City Front Partners, Salt Lake Neighborhood Housing Services and Utah Housing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
City National Bank v. Breslin et al
as 2:2012cv00939
Plaintiff:
City National Bank
Defendant:
Jack L. Breslin, Julie A. Breslin and Walter L. Breslin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Howard v. Halliday et al
as 2:2012cv00445
Plaintiff:
John-Mark Howard
Defendant:
Paul M. Halliday, Jr. , Citi Mortgage and PNC Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
York v. Ameriquest Mortgage et al
as 2:2012cv00318
Plaintiff:
William M. York
Defendant:
Ameriquest Mortgage , AMC Mortgage Services , Citi Residential Lending and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schmitt v. Stearns Lending et al
as 2:2011cv00381
Plaintiff:
Neil M. Schmitt
Defendant:
Stearns Lending , Citimortgage , National City Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PacifiCorp v. Tooele, City of
as 2:2010cv01278
Plaintiff:
PacifiCorp
Defendant:
Tooele, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curtis et al v. US Bank NA et al
as 2:2010cv00836
Plaintiff:
Clark H. Curtis and Stacey Curtis
Defendant:
US Bank NA, National City and Green Tree Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
