Cases 1 - 8 of 8
LUMPKINS v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2014cv00333
Plaintiff:
BARBARA B. LUMPKINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, JAY C. ZAINEY, SUSAN E. MORGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
MONTANO et al v. DYER et al
as 1:2013cv01319
Plaintiff:
GLORIA ISABEL MONTANO and SEAN PATRICK GREENE
Defendant:
DENNIS J. DYER, CRAIG A. LEVINE, ESQ., CRAIG A. LEVINE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
LEPPER et al v. MEYER et al
as 1:2010cv02116
Plaintiff:
DENNIS LEPPER, JEREMY HERRMANN and MELODY HERRMANN
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. MEYER and MEYER GROUP, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEVENSON v. ESTATE OF LORRAINE S. MASSEY et al
as 1:2010cv00317
Plaintiff:
DENNIS STEVENSON
Defendant:
ESTATE OF LORRAINE S. MASSEY, FIRST MARINER BANK, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
COMER v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
DENNIS COMER
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., WELLS FARGO HOME MORTAGAGE, ICM ENTERPRISES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KELSEY v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA et al
as 1:2009cv02321
Plaintiff:
DENNIS-JAMES KELSEY
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, NA, RECON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
TEMPLE v. TRIPLE INVESTMENTS, LP et al
as 1:2009cv02022
Plaintiff:
DENNIS - ROBERT TEMPLE
Defendant:
TRIPLE INVESTMENTS, LP, PETER KERMAN, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
KELSEY v. BANK OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv02006
Plaintiff:
DENNIS-JAMES KELSEY
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and RECON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
