Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Pathak v. Association Lien Services Assessment Management Services et al
as 2:2017cv01779
Defendant:
Association Lien Services Assessment Management Services, Assurant Inc, Chetna Pathak and others
Plaintiff:
Anshu Bharat Pathak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
1597 Ashfield Valley Trust et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association System et al
as 2:2014cv02123
Counter Defendant:
1597 Ashfield Valley Trust, Absolute Collection Services, LLC, Hiddencrest/Parkhurst Community Association and others
Plaintiff:
1597 Ashfield Valley Trust, David Toth and Sirwan Toth
Intervenor Defendant:
Federal Housing Finance Agency
Counter Claimant:
Federal National Mortgage Association System
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association System, Oscar Moreno and Venta Financial Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Padilla et al v. PNC Mortgage, a division of PNC Bank, N.A., successor in interest by merger to National City Bank of Indiana et al
as 3:2011cv00326
Defendant:
Cal Western Reconveyance Corporation, a foreign corporation, GMAC Mortgage, LLC, a foreign limited liability company, LSI Title Agency, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Reyna V Moreno and Roberto M Padilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Goodwin et al v. Executive Trustee Services, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00306
Plaintiff:
Aleta Rose Goodwin, Robert Paul Mcartor, Heather Gabel and others
Defendant:
Executive Trustee Services, LLC, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Merscorp, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Moreno et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00153
Plaintiff:
Maria Moreno and Ruben Alcantara
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., United Financial Mortgage Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
