Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Burke v. USA et al
as 1:2019cv02218
Defendant:
Donald Dieckman, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Cox v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2019cv02121
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Kenneth C. Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Houston v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2018cv02914
Plaintiff:
Tracy Houston
Defendant:
Frances Terrell and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Loshbaugh v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2017cv01429
Plaintiff:
Stephen C. Loshbaugh
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Oren A. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Hopkins v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2016cv00488
Plaintiff:
Glenda Hopkins
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rowland et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2014cv00883
Plaintiff:
Travis Rowland and Melanie Rowland
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Eric Pingle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Garrett v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2012cv02427
Plaintiff:
Jan Garrett
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Support Services of America, Inc., J & K Professional Cleaners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Brooks v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2012cv01582
Plaintiff:
Cindy Brooks
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Sawatzky v. United States Postal Service, The
as 1:2011cv03182
Plaintiff:
Timothy Sawatzky
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Ceroni v. 4Front Engineered Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00667
Plaintiff:
Shirley A. Ceroni
Defendant:
4Front Engineered Solutions, Inc.
Interested_party:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
