Cases 21 - 30 of 33
DOE et al v. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE , EMMA SHULEVITZ and STEPHANIE SMITH
Defendant:
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY , GEORGETOWN SYNAGOGUE-KESHER ISRAEL CONGREGATION , NATIONAL CAPITAL MIKVAH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. GEORGETOWN SYNAGOGUE-KESHER ISRAEL CONGREGATION et al
as 1:2015cv00028
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, 2
Defendant:
GEORGETOWN SYNAGOGUE-KESHER ISRAEL CONGREGATION , NATIONAL CAPITAL MIKVAH, INC. and HISTADRUTH HORABONIM DEAMERICA-RABBINICAL COUNCIL OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. CABRERA
as 1:2014cv01005
Defendant:
ALFREDO SIMON CABRERA
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOPES v. JETSETDC, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01550
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LOPES
Defendant:
JETSETDC, LLC, LOTUS LOUNGE DC, MARK SPAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
CHARNEY v. TIFERETH ISRAEL CONGREGATION et al
as 1:2013cv01426
Plaintiff:
DEBRA CHARNEY
Defendant:
TIFERETH ISRAEL CONGREGATION , DIRECTORS OF TIFERETH ISRAEL CONGREGATION, TIFERETH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. BOZZUTO MANAGEMENT COMPANY et al
as 1:2011cv02169
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
BOZZUTO MANAGEMENT COMPANY and BROADWAY CAPITOL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABILEAH v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 1:2011cv01834
Plaintiff:
RACHEL TANYA ABILEAH
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. DE AMIGOS, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01755
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
DE AMIGOS, LLC and MAZIN SALEH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE v. SIPPER et al
as 1:2011cv00875
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
WILLIAM A. SIPPER and NEW LEAF BRANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SINGH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2010cv01615
Plaintiff:
MAHINDER SINGH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , RAJ K. DOHARE and JOHN/JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
