Cases 21 - 30 of 303
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02911
Plaintiff:
NEIL MURPHY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KENNEDY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02523
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY NEIL KENNEDY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALLEN et al v 3M COMPANY
as 9:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
ZACKERIE ALLEN, NICHOLAS AMATUZZO, EDWIN AMONG and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARKEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv24127
Plaintiff:
NEIL PHILIP MARKEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. PENAFLORIDA et al
as 3:2023cv23254
Defendant:
NEIL PENAFLORIDA, 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22770
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER NEIL SHELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOOTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21406
Plaintiff:
NEIL BOOTS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KRENZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18255
Plaintiff:
NEIL KRENZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WATKINS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16299
Plaintiff:
NEIL WATKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SANDERS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16024
Plaintiff:
NEIL SANDERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
