Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Vandermark et al v. DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02162
Defendant:
DePuy Synthes Johnson & Johnson Ireland Ltd., DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc., Medical Device Business Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lora Wallace and Sally Vandermark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Walmart Stores East, LP
as 2:2018cv02514
Plaintiff:
Arther L. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hutton v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02362
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Ortho, LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company and others
Plaintiff:
Gwen Hutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caranchini v. Peck et al
as 2:2018cv02249
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn G. Caranchini
Defendant:
Lola Peck , Rick Peck, IV , Calvin Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Williams v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02474
Plaintiff:
Nancy Williams
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02473
Plaintiff:
Nancy Williams
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon Woman's Health & Urology, Gynecare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Shirk
as 6:2017cv01120
Plaintiff:
Dale Johnson
Defendant:
Tanner Joseph Shirk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hauserman v. AJ Freight Systems Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv01053
Plaintiff:
Robert Hauserman
Defendant:
AJ Freight Systems Inc., DD Logistics, Inc., Curtis Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crane, et al v. Corecivic et al
as 2:2017cv02031
Plaintiff:
Adam Crane and David Johnson
Defendant:
Corecivic and Securus Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Mestad v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02829
Plaintiff:
Margot Mestad
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. , Depuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
