Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Ngo vs. Matson Navigation Co., Inc.
as 1:2014cv00375
Plaintiff:
Don The Ngo
Defendant:
Matson Navigation Co., Inc., John Does 1-20, Mary Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Mount v. Blue Ocean Mariculture, LLC
as 1:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
Richard Mount and Ellen Frosch
Defendant:
Blue Ocean Mariculture, LLC, M/V Kona Kampachi I and M/V Kona Kampachi II
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Bosco v. M/V Pride of America
as 1:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Christina L Bosco
Defendant:
M/V Pride of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Pierce v. Maita'i Catamaran Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
Marshall Pierce
Defendant:
Maita'i Catamaran Corporation, John Does 1-20, Jane Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corrigan et al v. Lavaroy, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00678
Plaintiff:
Dean Corrigan and Stacy Corrigan
Defendant:
Lavaroy, LLC, M/V Protector and Roy Carvahlo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Endere v. White, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00434
Plaintiff:
Ehsor Thomas Endere
Defendant:
White, Inc., Jong Il Paik, John Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Espinueva v. Matson Navigation Company Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00234
Plaintiff:
Duane Espinueva
Defendant:
Matsonia, M/V and Matson Navigation Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Barnes v. Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Chad Barry Barnes
Defendant:
Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLC, Kris Henry, John Does 1-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Layman v. Lahaina Divers, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00602
Plaintiff:
Christopher Layman
Defendant:
Lahaina Divers, Inc. and Dauntless USCG M/V
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Alfouadi v. Wong et al
as 1:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
Raied Alfouadi
Defendant:
Edmond Wong and S/V Lady Barbara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
