Cases 31 - 40 of 448
Rosario et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 9:2021cv80352
Defendant:
VI-JON, LLC, Publix Super Markets, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin Ramos Rosario and Wanda Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferrer v. Ethicon Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv60050
Defendant:
Gynecare, Ethicon Women's Health & Urology, Ethicon Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Brooke J. Ferrer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mason v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv01078
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Lisa Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morales et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2021cv60142
Plaintiff:
Maruxa Morales and Juan Morales
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00042
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Rosella Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Villafane et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Rafael Villafane and Delia Villafane
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. DEPUY SYNTHES SALES INC et al
as 1:2020cv00131
Plaintiff:
Trina Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, Inc, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Merino v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2020cv25308
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Karina Merino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 6:2020cv02393
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Sara E. Anderson, Personal Representative for the Estate of Sharon M. Davis and Sara E. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haan v. Johnson & Johnson Inc.
as 8:2020cv03044
Plaintiff:
Darryl Lee Haan
Defendant:
Johnson + Johnson Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
