Torts - Injury Cases filed in New York
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,157
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02326
Plaintiff: Edgar Rodriguez
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Brijlall v. Christophersen
as 1:2024cv02321
Plaintiff: Teshwattie Brijlall
Defendant: Jeffrey Christophersen, United States Postal Service, The United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Bell v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02435
Plaintiff: Anthony George Bell
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Casarella v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02265
Plaintiff: Lynda Casarella
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Casarella et al
as 1:2024cv02264
Plaintiff: Lynda Casarella and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Zheng v. New York Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv02136
Plaintiff: Jia Jia Zheng
Defendant: New York Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital, Charles B Wang, Allan Ho, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Irizarry v. The United States of America
as 2:2024cv02096
Plaintiff: Crystal Irizarry
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Seneca v. Damiani et al
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff: Joyce Seneca and Joyce M. Seneca
Defendant: M.D. Amy Damiani, Corinne Krist Krist, D.O., Seneca Nation Health System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Wang v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01977
Plaintiff: TIANJIA WANG
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Birla et al v. Metropolitan Commercial Bank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv02019
Plaintiff: Georr Malaviga Birla and United States of America Ex. Rel.
Defendant: Metropolitan Commercial Bank, Revolut Tecnologies, London HQ and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?