Cases 41 - 47 of 47
FLANAGAN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2010cv01643
Plaintiff:
SAUNDRA FLANAGAN , JAMES RUX , THOMAS RUX and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, AGENCIES AND INSTRUMENTALITIES OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, REPUBLIC OF THE SUDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
SYKES v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2010cv01393
Plaintiff:
MAURICE A. SYKES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , MARYANNE INCONTRO , ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LELCHOOK et al v. CENTRAL BANK OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2010cv01184
Plaintiff:
ESTER LELCHOOK , MICHAL LELCHOOK , YAEL LELCHOOK and others
Defendant:
CENTRAL BANK OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, BANK SADERAT IRAN, BANK SADERAT, PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOES 1 THROUGH 976 v. CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL,INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00404
Plaintiff:
DOES 1 THROUGH 976
Defendant:
CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL,INC., DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10 and DOES 11-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
SHATSKY et al v. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC et al
as 1:2008cv00496
Plaintiff:
SHABTAI SCOTT SHATSKY, JO ANNE SHATSKY, YOSEPH SHATSKY and others
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC, SYRIAN MINISTRY OF DEFENSE, MUSTAFA TLASS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JANE/JOHN DOES 1-144 v. CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv01048
Plaintiff:
JANE/JOHN DOES 1-144
Defendant:
CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. and DAVID DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
JANKOVIC et al v. INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP et al
as 1:2004cv01198
Plaintiff:
MILAN JANKOVIC , FIELDPOINT B.V. and UNITED BUSINESS ACTIVITIES HOLDING A.G.
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP , JAMES LYON and DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
