Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Lane v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv11819
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lane
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Unimed Pharmaceuticals, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 1:2015cv09407
Plaintiff:
John Lane and Frances Lane
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv07880
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lane Johnson
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franzen v. Airgas USA, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv06728
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC , Trusco Manufacturing Company , Lane Heatherwick and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Franzen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2015cv00049
Plaintiff:
Robert L Lane and Kari Lane
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company and Lilly USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Lane v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10483
Plaintiff:
Richard Lane
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Truax v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02935
Plaintiff:
Roccie Lane Truax
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc. and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane Sr v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02611
Plaintiff:
Charles D Lane Sr
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vose et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb & Company et al
as 1:2013cv04804
Plaintiff:
Eugene E. Vose , James L. Addington , Harvey Allen, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb & Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lane v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc
as 3:2013cv50711
Plaintiff:
Belinda C. Lane
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
