Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Woras v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv00178
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Woras
Defendant:
United States of America and Doe Employees I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
United States of America v. Woodworth
as 1:2014cv00522
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Camille K. Woodworth
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Lewis et al v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00448
Plaintiff:
Kurt Lewis and Connie Lewis
Defendant:
United States of America and Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Arteaga-Ruiz et al v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv00061
Plaintiff:
Jose Arteaga-Ruiz , Lilia Ruiz-Arteaga and Jose Arteaga-Arteaga
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
United States of America v. Griffith et al
as 1:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of Idaho
Defendant:
Robert Griffith and Mariann Griffith
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
S. et al v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00432
Plaintiff:
C. K. S. , Kevin L. Swan and Jazmin Sierra
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Linford v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00194
Plaintiff:
Karleen Crystal Linford
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Cheyney et al v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
Robert Cheyney and Shana Cheyney
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Armstrong et al v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Melinda Armstrong and Richard Armstrong
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Hamann v. Hamilton & Spear Painting et al
as 1:2013cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jay Hamann
Defendant:
Hamilton & Spear Painting , Northcon, Inc. , Wall 2 Wall Floorcovering and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
