Cases 51 - 60 of 72
ZEPHIR et al v. BROWN et al
as 1:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ZEPHIR and GWENDOLYN F. BARKER
Defendant:
WAVERY BROWN and BATTELE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SPENCER et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2012cv00042
Plaintiff:
KENNETH S. SPENCER, JR. , FRANCES A. SPENCER , AMY L. MORROW and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
BROWN v. MV TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv02032
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN
Defendant:
MV TRANSPORTATION, INC. , DIAMOND TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. and METRO ACCESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOGLAN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2011cv01634
Plaintiff:
ALICE HOGLAN , KELLY ARTHURS , KAREN BINGHAM and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ALI AKBAR HASHEMI RAFSANJANI, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331
BROWN v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 1:2011cv01074
Plaintiff:
AUDREY BROWN
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00243
Plaintiff:
WILLIE BROWN, JR.
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00191
Plaintiff:
MATT BRIGGS BROWN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv02162
Plaintiff:
QUEEN BROWN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv02065
Plaintiff:
TRAYAWN BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
BROWN v. COLUMBIA SUSSEX CORPORATION et al
as 1:2010cv01227
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO BROWN
Defendant:
COLUMBIA SUSSEX CORPORATION , WESTIN WASHINGTON D.C. CITY CENTER and HAKAN SARACOGLU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
