Cases 51 - 60 of 1,260
Dajani v. Rittie et al
as 1:2023cv07315
Plaintiff:
Tony Dajani
Defendant:
Jacqueline Nova Rittie and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au Diversity-Auto Negligence
Aptsiauri v. The Hartwood Club, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv07308
Plaintiff:
Nana Aptsiauri
Defendant:
The Hartwood Club, Inc., ABC Company and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Fang v. DOE
as 1:2023cv06099
Plaintiff:
Qi Shu Fang
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Kevin Kerveng Tung, P.C.
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Polanco v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv07101
Plaintiff:
Juan A. Polanco
Defendant:
John Doe, D.L. Peterson Trust and Perdue Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Rapaport v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2023cv06709
Plaintiff:
Gideon Rapaport
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Hawley v. EnerSys, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv06416
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hawley
Cross Claimant:
EnerSys, Inc. and EnerSys Delaware, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Henkel Corporation and Henkel US Operations Corporation
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Keeslar v. Weathers et al
as 1:2023cv06422
Defendant:
MORIS WEATHERS, Robert Santos, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN KEESLAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Doe v. Gross
as 1:2023cv06325
Defendant:
JENNIFER LYNN GROSS and JENNIFER STENGAARD GROSS
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Cole v. Doe
as 1:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
William Cole
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burkhart v. Perry et al
as 1:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Jordan Burkhart
Defendant:
Christopher T. Perry, Christopher P, Perry, Matthew R. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
