Cases 51 - 60 of 149
Petersen et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv01247
Plaintiff:
Dolores Petersen and Thomas Petersen
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor North America, Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Watts
as 2:2017cv01212
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Sundee Marie Watts
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
USA v. King
as 2:2017cv01090
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Tina Ann King
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Blackburn v. USA et al
as 2:2017cv00999
Plaintiff:
Tonya Kim Blackburn
Defendant:
USA, Elizabeth Lazier Holtby, Patrick Mark Scherer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Warner v. Recreational Equipment et al
as 2:2017cv00991
Plaintiff:
Hollie Warner
Defendant:
Recreational Equipment , SOTO USA and Shin Fuji Burner Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wasson v. USA et al
as 2:2017cv00931
Plaintiff:
Derek Wasson
Defendant:
USA, United States Department of Veterans Affairs and Balamurali Krishna Ambati
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Mildner et al v. JBS USA et al
as 1:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
Stefan Mildner and Doreen Mildner
Defendant:
JBS USA and Gleeson Constructors & Engineering
Cross_claimant:
JBS USA and Gleeson Constructors & Engineering
Cross_defendant:
Gleeson Constructors & Engineering and JBS USA
Thirdparty_defendant:
Retrotech
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
JBS USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valdez v. Independent Riggers et al
as 2:2017cv00538
Plaintiff:
Andy Valdez
Defendant:
Independent Riggers, Andrew Louth, Nabors Drilling USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finken v. USA Cycling
as 1:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Gerald Finken
Defendant:
USA Cycling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sevey v. Harbor Freight Tools USA
as 2:2017cv00332
Plaintiff:
Betty Sevey
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
