Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Jacobs-Peterson et al v. USA et al
as 2:2013cv00209
Plaintiff:
Lu Ann Jacobs-Peterson and Gayle Pete Peterson
Defendant:
USA and Army National Guard of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Broussard v. United States Army Medical Command
as 2:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
Dwight Ole Broussard
Defendant:
United States Army Medical Command
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Smith v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2012cv00968
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Smith
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Redd et al v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv01162
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Redd , Jericca Redd , Jamaica Redd Lyman and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Carchidi v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv00444
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Carchidi
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Diop v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00202
Plaintiff:
Anta Diop
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Diegelman et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2010cv01152
Plaintiff:
Cristina Ardene Diegelman and Dave Diegelman
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior and National Park Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richards v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv00103
Plaintiff:
Rees G. Richards
Defendant:
United States of America and Bryce Acres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bowen v. Montalvo et al
as 1:2010cv00075
Plaintiff:
Randy Bowen
Defendant:
Jimmy Montalvo, United States of America and United States Automobile Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Betz v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv00447
Plaintiff:
Leslie Dale Betz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
