Cases 61 - 70 of 102
Cosat v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04781
Plaintiff:
Clifford Cosat
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rizos v. Joint Medical Products Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv04520
Plaintiff:
Adam Rizos
Defendant:
Joint Medical Products Corp. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rojek v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2012cv03256
Plaintiff:
Lucy Rojek
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Malicki et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02457
Plaintiff:
Paul Malicki and Elizabeth Malicki
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maldonado et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Ada Maldonado and Wayne Burley
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Depuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garon v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01168
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Garon
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Porter v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00801
Plaintiff:
Thomas Porter
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Premier Orthopaedic Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dougherty v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01021
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dougherty
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Depuy Inc, Depuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watson v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc
as 2:2011cv02269
Plaintiff:
Terry Sue Watson
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norinsky et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2011cv07821
Plaintiff:
Pamela Norinsky and Ronald Norinsky
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
