Cases 71 - 80 of 149
Rider et al v. Kawasaki Motors Corporation USA et al
as 2:2016cv01086
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rider and Natalie Rider
Defendant:
Kawasaki Motors Corporation USA , Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Carb Medic H20 Zone and others
Cross_claimant:
Kawasaki Motors Corporation USA
Cross_defendant:
H20 Zone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beutler et al v. Toyo Tire & Rubber Co. et al
as 2:2016cv00997
Plaintiff:
Tonya Beutler , Austin Beutler and Madelyn Beutler
Defendant:
Toyo Tire & Rubber Co. and Toyo Tire USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barben v. Beretta USA et al
as 1:2016cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jacob Sean Barben
Defendant:
Beretta USA and Federal Cartridge Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruiz et al v. USA et al
as 2:2016cv00452
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ruiz and Leticia Duran
Defendant:
USA and Saskia Spiess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
McQueen et al v. KAP Electric et al
as 2:2016cv00419
Plaintiff:
Whitney McQueen and Jenny Wesenberg
Defendant:
KAP Electric and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Dayley v. USA et al
as 2:2016cv00249
Plaintiff:
Jared K. Dayley
Defendant:
USA, Marie Y. Shelton and Aaron Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Hunter v. USA et al
as 2:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
Shauni Hunter
Defendant:
USA, Department of the Army and Army Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Munoz v. Ryobi Limited et al
as 2:2016cv00100
Plaintiff:
German Munoz
Defendant:
Ryobi Limited , Ryobi Technologies , One World Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
St. Peter v. USA et al
as 2:2015cv00815
Plaintiff:
David Joseph St. Peter
Defendant:
USA and Megan Brennan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Prime et al v. USA et al
as 2:2015cv00520
Plaintiff:
Richard Prime , Bences Montoya and Bernice Montoya
Defendant:
USA, United States Department of Defense, United States Department of the Army and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
