Cases 1 - 10 of 38
HOYLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03079
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W HOYLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
REED v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10961
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. REED, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COLEMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09392
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. COLEMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ARMOUR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02228
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. ARMOUR, JR. and CHARLES W ARMOUR, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STOKES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25063
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W STOKES and CHARLES W STOKES, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAWE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07316
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W DAWE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WUSSICK v. MOFFITT et al
as 1:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Charles W Wussick
Defendant:
Gail E Moffitt, Farmers Casualty Insurance Company and Timothy L Keith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
LEMONIAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59527
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W LEMONIAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLAYPOOL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58604
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W CLAYPOOL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21045
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W ALLEN JR
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
