Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Pamela Sutherland v. DCC Litigation Facility, Incorporated
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAMELA D. SUTHERLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
DCC LITIGATION FACILITY, INCORPORATED
Greenstreet v. DCC Propane, LLC d/b/a Deluca Gas et al
as 1:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
Christopher Greenstreet
Defendant:
DCC Propane, LLC doing business as Deluca Gas and Quality Steel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pamela Sutherland v. DCC Litigation Facility, Inc.
as 16-2397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAMELA D. SUTHERLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
DCC LITIGATION FACILITY, INCORPORATED
Kathy Gatza v. DCC Litigation Facility, Inc.
as 16-2396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHY JEAN GATZA
Defendant - Appellee:
DCC LITIGATION FACILITY, INCORPORATED
Beverly Ezra v. DCC Litigation Facility, Inc.
as 15-2215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BEVERLY J. EZRA
Defendant - Appellee:
DCC LITIGATION FACILITY, INCORPORATED
In re: Pamela Sutherland v. DCC Litigation Facility, Inc.
as 13-1497
Debtor:
In re: DOW CORNING CORPORATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAMELA D. SUTHERLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
DCC LITIGATION FACILITY, INCORPORATED
Beverly Ezra v. DCC Litigation Facility, Inc.
as 13-1491
Debtor:
In re: DOW CORNING CORPORATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BEVERLY J. EZRA
Defendant - Appellee:
DCC LITIGATION FACILITY, INCORPORATED
Kathy Gatza v. DCC Litigation Facility, Incor
as 13-1469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHY JEAN GATZA
Defendant - Appellee:
DCC LITIGATION FACILITY, INCORPORATED
Helen Miller v. DCC Litigation Facility, Inc.
as 13-1474
Debtor:
In re: DOW CORNING CORPORATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HELEN MARLENE MILLER, 15510 Ovitt, Perrysburg, OH 43551
Defendant - Appellee:
DCC LITIGATION FACILITY, INCORPORATED
Orelus v. The Simpson Organization, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00413
Plaintiff:
Miraclide Orelus
Defendant:
The Simpson Organization, Inc. and DCC Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
