Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Abrams et al v. City of Niagara Falls et al
as 1:2020cv00137
Plaintiff:
Eric P. Abrams, Aisha Carr Whiteside-Hands, Queenie Blue and others
Defendant:
Miller Springs Remediation Management, Inc., Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc., Scott Lawn Yard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Barber et al v. City of Niagara Falls et al
as 1:2020cv00141
Plaintiff:
Ronald William Lester, Eleanor Barber, Christian T. Hanover and others
Defendant:
Miller Springs Remediation Management, Inc., Occidental Chemical Corporation, Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Global Supplies NY, Inc. v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 1:2019cv04823
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Performance Solutions, Inc., Simple Wishes, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Global Supplies NY, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
O.D. Dyes, Jr. v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2019cv03189
Plaintiff:
O.D. DYES
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dye v. Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP et al
as 1:2018cv03048
Defendant:
John Doe Name Being Fictitious and Intended for the Operator of the Vehicle and Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP
Plaintiff:
Valerie Dye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Castro v. Dye et al
as 1:2011cv09694
Plaintiff:
Elmer Castro
Defendant:
Theodore Dye, Jr. , Teddy Dye, Jr., C&C Trucking of Duncan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Masache v. Brausse Group et al
as 7:2010cv04698
Plaintiff:
Edison Masache
Defendant:
Brausse Group, Printech Equipment, Inc. and Brausse Dye Cutting and Converting Equiptment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dye et al v. 1540 Broadway Owner, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv04798
Plaintiff:
Carol Dye and Thomas Dye
Defendant:
1540 Broadway Owner, LLC and Macklowe Management Co. Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
