Cases 1 - 10 of 23
VENABLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv21221
Plaintiff:
DEVON VENABLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VENABLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07010
Plaintiff:
RYAN VENABLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Preston et al v. Managed Care of North America Inc
as 0:2023cv61294
Plaintiff:
Scott Preston, B. W., C. W. and others
Defendant:
Managed Care of North America Inc doing business as MCNA Dental
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Preston v. W. et al
as 0:2023cv61292
Plaintiff:
Scott Preston
Defendant:
B. W., C. W., J. A. M. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
VENABLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06509
Plaintiff:
LARRY VENABLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VAUGHT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04765
Plaintiff:
JAMES VAUGHT, JEREMY JACKSON, LEE ASH and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VENABLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15517
Plaintiff:
SEAN VENABLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RV v. Grindr, LLC
as 3:2022cv00864
Plaintiff:
Richard Venable and R. V.
Defendant:
Grindr, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VENABLE JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv09849
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD VENABLE JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VENABLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv75415
Plaintiff:
LARRY VENABLE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
