Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Wagner v. Lowe's Home Improvement et al
as 1:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Wagner
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Improvement, Lowe's Corporate N.C., Marvin Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Asbestos Litigation
as 1:2018cv01029
Defendant:
Asbestos Litigation, Fluor Daniel Maintenance Services, Inc., Foster Wheeler LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Judith Booze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rogers v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv01570
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Bird Incorporated , CBS Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Warren Pumps LLC
Cross_defendant:
Warren Pumps LLC , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Bird Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
DePalma v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv01307
Plaintiff:
Louis DePalma
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , American Optical Corporation , Asbestos Corporation Ltd. and others
Cross_claimant:
FMC Corporation , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and Asbestos Corporation Ltd.
Cross_defendant:
FMC Corporation , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , American Optical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rose et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
David Rose and Freda Rose
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wagner v. Marshal Hotel & Resorts Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Mark Wagner
Defendant:
Marshall Hotels & Resorts Inc., Carolyn A. Metz , Sea Esta Motel I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
