Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CONNOR v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 2:2021cv14180
Plaintiff:
TAMMY LEE CONNOR
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HORAN v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
as 3:2021cv00734
Defendant:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HORAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cardoso v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 0:2021cv60784
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mariana Cardoso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
as 3:2021cv00733
Defendant:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lafratta v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 0:2018cv62788
Defendant:
Maytag Sales, Inc., Whirlpool Corporation and Best Buy Co. of Minnesota, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Luis Fabio Lafratta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United Property & Casualty Insurance Company et al v. Aaron's Sales & Lease Ownership, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00012
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and Aaron's Sales & Lease Ownership, Inc.
Plaintiff:
United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jakab v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et al
as 9:2017cv80165
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jakab
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC , Whirlpool Corporation and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finker et al v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 3:2013cv01154
Plaintiff:
Lazar S. Finker and Raissa M. Frenkel
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Krause v. Bondex International, Inc. et al
as 8:2007cv01954
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Krause and Phyllis Krause
Defendant:
Bondex International, Inc., Bondex International, Inc., Certainteed Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Gaspar et al v. Sears Roebuck and Co. et al
as 5:2007cv00191
Plaintiff:
Maureen Gaspar and Ray Gaspar
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co., Cherry Corporation and Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
