Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Austin et al v. Novo Nordisk, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01711
Plaintiff:
Tommie Austin, Paulsen Bronston, Patricia Brooks and others
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk, Inc., NOVO NORDISK PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LP., NOVO NORDISK RESEARCH CENTER SEATTLE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq03401
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
David Johnson and Sarah Johnson
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq03094
Plaintiff:
Arland David Johnson
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Chevron USA Inc. and others
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanders et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00628
Plaintiff:
Pierre Sanders , Everton Johnson , Darrell Cottman and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hairston et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00609
Plaintiff:
Henry Hairston , Christopher Walker , Richard Smith and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trent et al v. Dominos Pizza, LLC
as 3:2013cv01027
Plaintiff:
Darin Trent and David Johnson
Defendant:
Dominos Pizza, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Napoles v. Johnson
as 1:2012cv10220
Defendant:
David Johnson, Sr. and David Johnson, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Cristian Napoles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Johnson v. County of Sangamon et al
as 3:2011cv03302
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Defendant:
County of Sangamon, Andrew Van Meter, Anthony Libri and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
