Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Asphalt Trader Limited v. Beall et al
as 1:2020cv00155
Defendant:
Three Canyon, Taryn Capital Energy, Robert Scott Beall and others
Plaintiff:
Asphalt Trader Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hafen v. Wells et al
as 2:2019cv00921
Plaintiff:
Jonathan O. Hafen
Defendant:
Igor Kovalenko, Adam Wells, Rosalie Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Jensen v. BMW of North America
as 1:2018cv00142
Plaintiff:
Robert Jensen
Defendant:
BMW of North America
Intervenor:
Progressive Classic Insurance Company a/s/o Robert Jensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Landau et al v. 160 White Pine et al
as 2:2018cv00296
Plaintiff:
Peter Landau and Madeline Landau
Defendant:
160 White Pine , Alpine Financial Resources , Magellan Group Investments and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Asphalt Trader Limited v. Beall et al
as 1:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Asphalt Trader Limited
Defendant:
Robert Scott Beall and Taryn Capital Energy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christensen v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv00784
Plaintiff:
Dean H. Christensen
Defendant:
Gerald K. Smith, Robert Jennings, Ray Ash and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anaeme v. USA et al
as 2:2014cv00281
Defendant:
Universal Services of America, Lawrence E. Delbridge, State of New Mexico and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
MacDonald et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co
as 2:2013cv00419
Plaintiff:
Doug MacDonald , Ronald Shiver , Robert Whitworth and others
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Property Damage
Greenleaf Enterprises et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co
as 2:2013cv00421
Plaintiff:
Greenleaf Enterprises , Jessica Acedo , Mary Ashcroft and others
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
