Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Astarita v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 6:2012cv01738
Plaintiff:
Joanne Astarita
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Foot Locker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Dick v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
as 0:2010cv60041
Plaintiff:
Mickhel Dick
Defendant:
Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lauria v. Dr. Jill's Foot Pads, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv61916
Plaintiff:
Louis Lauria and Louis Lauria
Defendant:
Dr. Jill's Foot Pads, Inc. and Jill Scheur
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Cooley v. Dr. Jill's Foot Pads, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv61634
Plaintiff:
Maude Cooley
Defendant:
Dr. Jill's Foot Pads, Inc., Jill Scheur and Jay Scheur
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Foote v. Unicare Life and Health Insurance Company
as 6:2009cv01703
Plaintiff:
Denise Foote
Defendant:
Unicare Life and Health Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Gawlas et al v. Schoenhaus
as 9:2009cv81078
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Gawlas
Defendant:
Foot Ankle & Leg Vein Center, LLC. and Jodi R. Schoenhaus
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Dotten v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv01124
Plaintiff:
Bruce Dotten and Bruce Dotten
Defendant:
Foot Locker Retail, Inc., Foot Locker Specialty, Inc. and Foot Locker Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Foote v. Unicare Life and Health Insurance Company
as 6:2008cv01574
Plaintiff:
Denise Foote
Defendant:
Unicare Life and Health Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Noble v. Merritt Island Foot & Ankle, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv00005
Plaintiff:
Theresa Noble and Theresa Noble
Defendant:
Merritt Island Foot & Ankle, Inc., William D. Campbell and Patricia Campbell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
