Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, New York City and Long Island Joint et al v. Euro Castle Construction, Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv03568
Plaintiff:
Bricklayer Local 1, Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, New York City and Long Island Joint, Bricklayers Labor Management Committee and others
Defendant:
Euro Castle Construction, Corp., The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and Pawel Wojcik
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Sullivan et al v. A&B Caulking Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03376
Defendant:
A&B Caulking Co., Inc., Bobbie Blumfield, John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary and others
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Local Union No. 1, B.A.C.I.U., AFL-CIO, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund and the International Masonry Institute and Jeremiah Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Trustees of the United Plant and Production Workers Local 175 Benefits Fund v. Petrillo Contracting Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00763
Defendant:
Petrillo Contracting Inc., Power Concrete Co., Inc., The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the United Plant and Production Workers Local 175 Benefits Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Pavers and Road Builders District Council Welfare, Pension, Annuity and Apprenticeship, Skill Improvement and Safety Funds et al v. Long Island Concrete Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00310
Defendant:
Long Island Concrete Inc., The Ohio Insurance Company and Vigilant Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
The Highway, Road and Street Construction Laborers Local Union 1010 and Trustees of the Pavers and Road Builders District Council Welfare, Pension, Annuity and Apprenticeship, Skill Improvement and Safety Funds
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Schwartz et al v. Gutlove & Shirvint, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv08594
Plaintiff:
Leonard Schwartz , Arthur Katz , Barry Feldman and others
Defendant:
Gutlove & Shirvint, Inc., Getouttadodge Corp., Gulfstream Sunsets, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
Trustees of the Structural Steel and Bridge Painters of Greater New York Employee Trust Funds and Trustees of the District Council 9 Painting Industry Insurance and Annuity Funds v. Mimosa Construction, Inc. et al
as 7:2011cv08358
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Structural Steel and Bridge Painters of Greater New York Employee Trust Funds and Trustees of the District Council 9 Painting Industry Insurance and Annuity Funds
Defendant:
Mimosa Construction, Inc. and Ohio Farmers Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local No. 38 Vacation Fund et al v. A. Prokosch & Sons Sheet Metal, Inc. et al
as 7:2010cv03454
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local No. 38 Vacation Fund , Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local No. 38 Insurance and Welfare Fund , Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local No. 38 Profit Sharing Plan and others
Defendant:
A. Prokosch & Sons Sheet Metal, Inc. , Alfred Prokosch, Jr. and The Ohio Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of The Structural Steel and Bridge Painters of Greater New York Employee Trust Funds et al v. Geronimo Painting Company of Ohio
as 7:2010cv01826
Plaintiff:
Trustees of The Structural Steel and Bridge Painters of Greater New York Employee Trust Funds and Trustees of The District Council 9 Painting Industry Insurance and Annuity Funds,
Defendant:
Geronimo Painting Company of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
