Labor Cases filed in New York
Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Providence Construction Corp.
as 1:2019cv07384
Petitioner: Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticehsip, Journeyman Reatrining, Educational and Industry Fund, The New York City District Council of Carpenters, Trustees of the New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Funds and others
Respondent: Providence Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Milano v. Provident Life & Casualty Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv03357
Plaintiff: ALFRED DERF MILANO
Defendant: Unum Group, Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and Provident Life & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Providence Construction Corp. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv05985
Petitioner: The New York City and Vicinity Carpenters Labor Management Corporation, Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund, New York City District Council of Carpenters and others
Respondent: Providence Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Mason Tenders District Council of Greater New York and Long Island v. Providence Construction Corp.
as 1:2018cv05706
Petitioner: Mason Tenders District Council of Greater New York and Long Island
Respondent: Providence Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Sullivan et al v. Providence Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv05345
Defendant: Sailaja Chitta, John and/or Jane Doe Fiduciary and Providence Construction Corp.
Plaintiff: Jeremiah Sullivan, Jeremiah Sullivan and Trustees of the Bricklayers & Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, and Trustees of the International Masonry Institute
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, New York City and Long Island Joint et al v. Providence Contruction Corp. et al
as 1:2016cv06346
Plaintiff: Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Pension Fund, Bricklayers Supplemental Annuity Fund, Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund, New York City and Long Island Joint, International Masonry Institute and Jeremiah Sullivan, Jr.
Defendant: Sailaja Chitta and Providence Contruction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Khan v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00811
Plaintiff: Farooq Khan
Defendant: Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Curtis v. Windstream Preferred Provider Organization Plan
as 6:2015cv06504
Plaintiff: Lucas Curtis
Defendant: Windstream Preferred Provider Organization Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund et al v. Providence Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv06436
Plaintiff: Bricklayers Insurance and Welfare Fund, Bricklayers Labor Management Committee, Bricklayers Local 1 and others
Defendant: Srikanth Chimata, Construction Company, Inc., Providence Construction Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Atienza v. American Healthcare Facility Management Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv08137
Plaintiff: Michael Atienza
Defendant: American Healthcare Facility Management Group, Inc., Axis Point Alternative Solutions, Inc., American Manpower Resource Provider, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?