Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Thomas v. Mallen et al
as 1:2013cv22269
Plaintiff:
Keela Thomas
Defendant:
Randolph Mallen and Bobby's Liquors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Jackson et al
as 3:2011cv00967
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
James Jackson, Anthony Harris, Tonette Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Randolph v. Palm Restaurant Services Inc et al
as 9:2011cv80252
Plaintiff:
Samuel Randolph
Defendant:
Palm Restaurant Services Inc , Stewart Bogatz and David Bogatz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Spelta v. Building Systems Evaluation, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00379
Plaintiff:
Philip Spelta
Defendant:
Building Systems Evaluation, Inc. and Randolph Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Freeman v. Health Management Associates Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00673
Plaintiff:
Janet Freeman, Janet Freeman, Janet Freeman and others
Defendant:
Health Management Associates Inc., Kent P. Dauten, Donald E. Kiernan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Johnson v. Charlie Frymyer Paving, Inc. et al
as 0:2007cv61314
Plaintiff:
Randolph Johnson
Defendant:
Charlie Frymyer Paving, Inc. and Philip Friona, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Abarca v. Discovery Marketing and Distributing, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv21995
Plaintiff:
Jose Abarca
Defendant:
Discovery Marketing and Distributing, Inc., Timothy V. Randolph and Timothy V. Randolph, II
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Randolph v. Capri Engineering et al
as 0:2007cv60431
Plaintiff:
Scott C. Randolph
Defendant:
Capri Engineering, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Truitt et al v. Byrd et al
as 3:2007cv00204
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Truitt, Wilbur Cain, Ricky Felton and others
Defendant:
William Randolph Byrd, II and Ronald R. Evans, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
