Labor Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
SOLID PLATFORMS, INC. et al v. LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv00426
Plaintiff: SOLID PLATFORMS, INC. and UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS & JOINERS OF AMERICA
Defendant: LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA and NATIONAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS POLICY COMMITTEE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA et al v. OPERATIVE PLASTERS' & CEMENT MASONS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES & CANADA, AFL-CIO We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02212
Petitioner: UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA and SOUTHWEST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Respondent: OPERATIVE PLASTERS' & CEMENT MASONS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES & CANADA, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Type: Labor None
CARPENTERS LABOR-MANAGEMENT PENSION FUND et al v. MILLBROOK MILLWORK, INC.
as 1:2009cv02070
Plaintiff: CARPENTERS LABOR-MANAGEMENT PENSION FUND, DOUGLAS MCCARRON, RICHARD ARISPE and others
Defendant: MILLBROOK MILLWORK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None
SAVARIA v. MID-ATLANTIC REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS et al
as 1:2009cv01920
Plaintiff: RHINA SAVARIA
Defendant: MID-ATLANTIC REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS and GEMGROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Type: Labor None
OPERATIVE PLASTERERS' AND CEMENT MASONS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA v. JORDAN INTERIORS, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01160
Petitioner: OPERATIVE PLASTERERS' AND CEMENT MASONS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA
Respondent: JORDAN INTERIORS, INC., UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA and SOUTHWEST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Type: Labor None
PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS v. LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01128
Plaintiff: PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Defendant: LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, LABORERS LOCAL 348 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Type: Labor None
PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS v. LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv01128
Plaintiff: PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Defendant: LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, LABORERS LOCAL 348 and BRAND ENERGY SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Type: Labor None
LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA v. BRAND ENERGY SERVICES, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00620
Petitioner: LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA and LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA
Respondent: BRAND ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGIONAL CONFERENCE OF CARPENTERS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
ABATE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01265
Plaintiff: MICHAEL J. ABATE, EVERETT T. ABBOTT, STEVE E. ALLEN and others
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Defendant
CARPENTERS LABOR-MANAGEMENT PENSION FUND et al v. KERR 3 CONSTRUCTION GROUP L.L.C.
as 1:2007cv00419
Plaintiff: CARPENTERS LABOR-MANAGEMENT PENSION FUND, DOUGLAS MCCARRON, RICHARD ARISPE and others
Defendant: KERR 3 CONSTRUCTION GROUP L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?