Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Snyder v. Federal-Mogul Corporation
as 5:2012cv00439
Plaintiff:
Franklin D. Snyder
Defendant:
Federal-Mogul Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
SAPP v. LINKED COMMUNICATIONS et al
as 3:2012cv00245
Plaintiff:
JASON SAPP
Defendant:
LINKED COMMUNICATIONS and PAUL FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perez v. Get Me, Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv20600
Plaintiff:
Jean P. Perez
Defendant:
Get Me, Corp. and Franklin E. Vergara
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Armstrong v. Lipizzaner Stallions, Inc. et al
as 6:2012cv00130
Plaintiff:
Franklin Armstrong
Defendant:
Lipizzaner Stallions, Inc., Gary Lashinsky and Elizabeth Lashinsky
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fortuna v. Flavor of Peru, Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv24539
Plaintiff:
Franklin Fortuna
Defendant:
Flavor of Peru, Corp. and Jesus E. Zelada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Knight v. Franklin Street Financial Partners, LLC
as 8:2011cv02357
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Knight
Defendant:
Franklin Street Financial Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Noto v. Anchor Pool Service, Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv02143
Plaintiff:
Stephen Noto
Defendant:
Anchor Pool Service, Inc. and Franklin Lockhart
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dunakin et al v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2011cv22332
Plaintiff:
Ray Dunakin , Daniel D. Fitzgerald , William E. Harilson and others
Defendant:
UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
Reynoso v. Mevco, Inc et al
as 0:2009cv61612
Plaintiff:
Franklin Reynoso and Franklin Reynoso
Defendant:
Mevco, Inc and Vito Ciaciulli
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Franklin v. Driveway Maintenance, Inc et al
as 1:2009cv22941
Plaintiff:
Otis Earl Franklin
Defendant:
Driveway Maintenance, Inc, All-Dade Driveway Maintenance Co, Ray C Applebaum and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
