Labor Cases filed in Utah
Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Fetzers' Inc. v. Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust
as 2:2009cv00541
Plaintiff: Fetzers' Inc.
Defendant: Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Labor None
Snyder v. California Ironworkers Field Pension Fund et al
as 2:2009cv00456
Plaintiff: Raymond Max Snyder
Defendant: California Ironworkers Field Pension Fund, Board of Trustees of California Ironworkers Field Pension Fund and Ironworkers Employees Benefit Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type: Labor None
Baker et al v. Dark Horse Steel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00448
Plaintiff: Mike Baker, Michael McDonald, Jerry Romero and others
Defendant: Dark Horse Steel, Scot Evans and Jessie Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Labor None
Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust v. Coates Construction & Engineering et al
as 2:2008cv00890
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust
Defendant: Coates Construction & Engineering, S.L.C. Rail Constructors, Wasatch Electric and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust v. Woodworkers of Denver
as 2:2008cv00354
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust, Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust and Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust
Defendant: Woodworkers of Denver
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust v. Fluor Maintenance Services
as 2:2008cv00346
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust, Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust, Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust and others
Defendant: Fluor Maintenance Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None
Trustees of the Utah Carpenters' and Cement Masons' Pension Trust v. Tolboe Construction
as 2:2008cv00316
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust, Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust and Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust
Defendant: Tolboe Construction
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust v. New Star/Culp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00699
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust
Defendant: New Star/Culp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the Intermountain Ironworkers Pension Trust Fund, The et al v. Siouxland Steel Erection et al
as 2:2007cv00118
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Intermountain Ironworkers Pension Trust Fund, The, Trustees of the Intermountain Ironworkers Pension Trust Fund, The, Trustees of the Ironworkers Intermountain Health & Welfare Trust Fund, The and others
Defendant: Siouxland Steel Erection and Leonard G. March
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust v. Daw Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00087
Plaintiff: Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust, Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust and Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust
Defendant: Daw Inc and Daw Inc
Counter Claimant: Daw Inc and Daw Inc
Counter Defendant: Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust, Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust and Trustees of the Utah Carpenters and Cement Masons Pension Trust
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?