Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Atkinson v. Korth Cabinets & Mill Work, Inc.
as 0:2009cv61601
Plaintiff:
Diane Atkinson and Diane Atkinson
Defendant:
Korth Cabinets & Mill Work, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Svetlick et al v. K.S. Geisler, Inc.
as 0:2009cv60994
Plaintiff:
David Svetlick, Larry Dugger, Mark Lee and others
Defendant:
K.S. Geisler, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Svetlick et al v. Riverside Electric, Inc.
as 0:2009cv60993
Plaintiff:
David Svetlick, Larry Dugger, Mark Lee and others
Defendant:
Riverside Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Mills v. Network Express, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00576
Plaintiff:
Noel Mills
Defendant:
Network Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Svetlick et al v. Applied Building Tec.
as 0:2009cv60109
Plaintiff:
David Svetlick, Larry Dugger, Mark Lee and others
Defendant:
Applied Building Tec.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Svetlick et al v. Paramount Electric Inc
as 0:2009cv60108
Plaintiff:
David Svetlick, Larry Dugger, Mark Lee and others
Defendant:
Paramount Electric Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mills v. MJ Employment Services, Inc.
as 5:2009cv00015
Plaintiff:
Katherine Mills and Katherine Mills
Defendant:
MJ Employment Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Svetlick et al v. Adams Electric, Inc.
as 0:2008cv61594
Plaintiff:
David Svetlick, David Svetlick, Larry Dugger and others
Defendant:
Adams Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Svetlick et al v. Lucius
as 0:2008cv61525
Plaintiff:
David Svetlick, Larry Dugger, Mark Lee and others
Defendant:
Chris M. Lucius
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Svetlick et al v. Brown et al
as 0:2008cv61328
Plaintiff:
David Svetlick, Larry Dugger, Mark Lee and others
Defendant:
Cyber Electric of Central Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
