Cases 51 - 60 of 477
Ordonez v. Filippo Vicari Construction Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02543
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ordonez
Defendant:
Filippo Vicari Construction Inc., Filippo Daniel Vicari, Enrico Vicari and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Sultan v. Mughal General Construction Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02373
Plaintiff:
Choudhry Sultan
Defendant:
Mughal General Construction Inc. and Mohammed Ramzan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. B and S Construction, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03340
Petitioner:
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund, Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York and others
Respondent:
B and S Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Zambrano et al v. Jermyn Contracting Corp. et al
as 7:2022cv03131
Plaintiff:
Francisco Zambrano and Jaime Huayllasaca
Defendant:
Jermyn Contracting Corp., Goliath Construction, Inc., Meadowbrook Builders, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 FLSA: Definitions
Trustees of the Pavers District Council Apprenticeship, Skill Improvement and Training Fund et al v. Lavin Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Pavers District Council Apprenticeship, Skill Improvement and Training Fund, Trustees of the Local 1010 Apprenticeship, Skill Improvement, and Training Fund and Trustees of the Pavers and Road Builders District Council Welfare, Pension, and Annuity Funds
Defendant:
Lavin Inc. and TDI Construction Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Delgado v. All Shore Marine Construction Inc.
as 2:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
Fausto Delgado
Defendant:
All Shore Marine Construction Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Trustees of the Pavers and Road Builders District Council Welfare, Pension, and Annuity Funds et al v. CP Perma Paving Construction, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Pavers and Road Builders District Council Welfare, Pension, and Annuity Funds and Trustees of the Local 1010 Apprenticeship, Skill Improvement, and Training Fund
Defendant:
CP Perma Paving Construction, Inc., Perma Pave Contracting Corp. and Charles Pasciuta doing business as Perma Pave Contracting Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Argila et al v. R.Z. United Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07087
Plaintiff:
Jack Argila and Trustees of the Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund and the International Masonry Institute
Defendant:
R.Z. United Construction, Inc., Riadul Islam, MD Meherul Islam Munna and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund et al v. Vrex Construction Inc.
as 1:2021cv09408
Petitioner:
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund, The Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York and others
Respondent:
Vrex Construction Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Walsh et al v. Macedo Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv06217
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Walsh
Defendant:
Macedo Construction, Inc., Macedo Contracting Services, Inc., Odecam Concrete Supply Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
