Cases 51 - 60 of 93
Aguilar-Zavala et al v. Riverbell, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv14001
Plaintiff:
Rey David Aguilar-Zavala , Luis Alfredo Canseco-Pensina , Juan Carlos Carabeo-Lopez and others
Defendant:
Riverbell, Inc. and Harmon Fruit Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Silva v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 1:2015cv23906
Plaintiff:
John Silva
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Silva v. Pro Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv23028
Plaintiff:
Julio Antonio Silva
Defendant:
Pro Transport, Inc. , Oscar Acharandio and Tony Menendez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Rigal et al v. Air Florida Heating & Cooling Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv22635
Plaintiff:
Angel A Rigal and Aristides Perdomo Silva
Defendant:
Air Florida Heating & Cooling Inc. and Jeffrey Scott Hophan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Palacio v. Dynamic Supply Corp et al
as 1:2015cv21221
Defendant:
Dynamic Supply Corp , Cesar Niada and Adriano Silva
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Palacio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mateos v. Sambodromo, LLC
as 1:2014cv23828
Defendant:
Sambodromo, LLC and Maximo Silva
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Mateos
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
SILVA v. RAYS BARBER SHOP, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv23758
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO SILVA
Defendant:
RAYS BARBER SHOP, INC. and JESUS ANTONIO ALVELO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Silva v. Firstservice Residential Florida, Inc.
as 0:2014cv61742
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Silva
Defendant:
Firstservice Residential Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Silva v. Gold Coast Management Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv61583
Plaintiff:
Oswaldo Silva, Jr.
Defendant:
Gold Coast Management Services, Inc. and Peter Sorrentino
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Polo v. Maxline Realty LLC et al
as 0:2014cv61517
Plaintiff:
Roque David Silva Polo
Defendant:
Maxline Realty LLC , Riverview South Apartments LLC , Santa Monica Apartments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
